By Peter Cole
Read Online or Download Access to Religion and Philosophy. Philosophy of Religion PDF
Similar religious studies books
This scarce antiquarian publication is a facsimile reprint of the unique. because of its age, it might comprise imperfections resembling marks, notations, marginalia and mistaken pages. simply because we think this paintings is culturally vital, now we have made it on hand as a part of our dedication for safeguarding, conserving, and selling the world's literature in reasonable, prime quality, sleek variants which are real to the unique paintings.
All through historical past, arguments for and opposed to the life of God were mostly restricted to philosophy and theology. meanwhile, technology has sat at the sidelines and quietly watched this online game of phrases march up and down the sector. even though technological know-how has revolutionised each element of human existence and vastly clarified our realizing of the realm, by some means the concept has arisen that it has not anything to claim concerning the chance of a perfect being, which a lot of humanity worships because the resource of all truth.
- Philosophers and God: At the Frontiers of Faith and Reason
- A strategy for a loss of faith: Jung's proposal
- The Errors of Atheism
Extra resources for Access to Religion and Philosophy. Philosophy of Religion
The proposition ‘All bachelors are married’ is analytic but false. It is analytic because the married state is part of the concept of ‘bachelor’. The fact that it is analytic does not tell you whether it is true or false, but merely how to decide whether it is true or false. The way to decide is by considering the meaning of the words. In passing it should be noted that a sentence such as ‘The cat sat on the mat’ is clearly not an analytic statement, since there is nothing in the analysis of the concept of ‘cat’ that contains the idea of ‘sitting on the mat’!
The AO2 needs some discussion about proof. Higher level answers will discuss in terms of inductive and deductive arguments, linking it to the cosmological argument form. There will be a weighing up of the strength of the argument and some conclusion drawn in terms of a lesser or greater probability of God’s existence. Higher level answers will explain the difference between probability and proof. Further questions to consider 1 Discuss the extent to which the cosmological argument for the existence of God offers a coherent explanation of the universe.
In other words, only God, a necessary being, can be the complete explanation for the existence of the universe that contains contingent items. It is the explanation that requires no further explanation. Some 200 years earlier, David Hume had argued that it was illegitimate to move from saying that every event in the universe has a cause to the claim that the universe has a cause. Bertrand Russell made a similar point by remarking that this was like moving from saying that every human being has a mother to the claim that the human race as a whole has a mother.